Page 2 of 2
Posted: 2007-10-10 09:14:11
by Charles1
Martin: That's great that Pro and Express can now adjust the baseline in a MathType equation! To answer your question: I believe(?) that I called Nisus on Friday (10/12) and again on Monday (10/15) when I left a message asking someone to contact me by phone or by email. My puzzlement was due to my receiving a message both times asking me to leave my email address. In the future, what is the best way to contact Nisus? [/quote]
Re: MathType 5.1 problems eliminated in MWP 1.01
Posted: 2007-10-10 13:34:24
by martin
pax wrote:The poor resolution of Mathtype image occurs after printing. The resolution on screen is okay even when zoomed 2400%. The images from LaTeXit are fine both on screen and after printing.
Sample document was sent via "Send Feedback".
pax
Thanks pax, I've received the document and will take a look.
Posted: 2007-10-10 13:36:36
by martin
Charles1 wrote:Martin: That's great that Pro and Express can now adjust the baseline in a MathType equation! To answer your question: I believe(?) that I called Nisus on Friday (10/12) and again on Monday (10/15) when I left a message asking someone to contact me by phone or by email. My puzzlement was due to my receiving a message both times asking me to leave my email address. In the future, what is the best way to contact Nisus?
Contacting us via email is the best- our listed phone number is not for technical support. Please see our
contact page for details.
Re: MathType 5.1 problems eliminated in MWP 1.01
Posted: 2007-10-26 18:13:26
by pax
martin wrote:pax wrote:The poor resolution of Mathtype image occurs after printing. The resolution on screen is okay even when zoomed 2400%. The images from LaTeXit are fine both on screen and after printing.
Sample document was sent via "Send Feedback".
pax
Thanks pax, I've received the document and will take a look.
Martin
The MathType pict images still look poor when printing in version 1.02 beta.